Zoom Logo

Out of Line: Queuing as a Distributive Principle and the Politics of Migration - Speaker view
Contentious Otter
35:01
In "Prophets of Deceit", Lowenthal & Guterman described the concept of "the overwhelming enemy" that the true believer rails against. The idea of the overwhelming enemy may be seen as related to the concept of learned helplessness, that the follower is powerless against on his own, and can only counter through participation in a mass movement. The concept of the line cutter may be described as a manifestation of that "overwhelming enemy" concept.
Moderator (Gözde)
38:07
Please feel free to pose comments or questions in the chat and we can get back to them in the Q/A. You will also have the chance to ask questions in the Q/A later on.
Dave Kamper
44:06
I keep coming up with questions, but Prof Cohen keeps answering them because her reasoning is so thorough.
Peter Schochet
50:47
the chat and cut?
Phil Triadsfilopoulos
52:08
Q: I wonder whether we need to be more attentive to questions of fairness. Queue jumping, whether experienced in a supermarket or a system of refugee status determination, happens. How SHOULD we respond to other behaving in bad faith? Your reference to the subject of the NPR interview suggests that his reaction was not so different form that of full-throated xenophobe. Is this fair? Evenhandedness and fairness are deeply democratic virtues; when they are violated, democratic citizens react, in predictable ways. Are they always wrong? How do we distinguish between justifiable expressions of indignation (catalyzed by the misuse of systems of selection and sequencing) and xenophobic racism?
Ashwini Vasanthakumar
58:14
Q
Kevin Elliott
58:59
Question! Put me in the queue!
Moderator (Gözde)
59:37
You are all in the queue! No line cutting.
Nelson Vanegas
01:00:41
I want to ask about how different the queu for justice in the sense of judiciary justice could be. Here people come into queu because they are accused of something or decide to sue or claim something. But here the queu does not work in the same way, people are sometimes served rapidly but many times wrongly and then they go to a different queu in which they spend years and many times die in it or are denied access all together. The judiciary is an example on how powerful, reach and entitled people exert they are entitlements to the detriment of others in a malformed queu to which some have no access almost at all. Specially minorities, disenfranchised people, immigrants and so on. 
Srinivas Yerramsetti
01:01:07
How can the concept of triage in hospitals be made to be part of structuring queues? Is that a good idea to move away from the first-come-first-served principle?
Joseph Carens
01:01:35
Terrific talk, Elizabeth. I have a 5 pm meeting and so am sorry not to stay for the discussion.
Moderator (Gözde)
01:02:00
The discussion will be recorded.
Benjamin Boudou
01:03:03
Q
Ashwini Vasanthakumar
01:19:21
we were shopping for biscuits.
Srinivas Yerramsetti
01:21:19
Are queues best understood as reified notions of fairness?
Srinivas Yerramsetti
01:37:51
Replace need with conferments of standings?
Srinivas Yerramsetti
01:39:44
Thank you. This is the most interesting talk I attended in a very long time
Moderator (Gözde)
01:40:02
We are glad to hear!
Moderator (Gözde)
01:40:06
Follow the Harney Program @harneymunk on Twitter for upcoming lectures and events!
Dave Kamper
01:46:44
Really amazing! Thank you so much!
Emily Nacol
01:46:52
Thank you so much for this great talk!
Yukiko Tanaka
01:46:58
Thank you so much Elizabeth, this talk was so fascinating and looking forward to future work
Nelson Vanegas
01:47:11
thanks!
Ian Van Haren
01:47:15
Thank you for an excellent talk. Looking forward to reading more!
Catherine Ramirez
01:47:20
Brilliant & inspiring talk! Gracias desde Santa Cruz, CA, USA